CO129-379 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1911 [8-9] — Page 209

unsinter

L

Ito subsection (9) opser 42 (added by see.

29 of This Ordinarie) which deals with

service of process in request of a foreign ritunal

in the Colony at the

Count

Øv

amends subs (1)

Subsection (2) of sec. 28

ора.

of see. 42 of the Principal Orchivianen by the insertionwy the words

wiit of summons"

notice of th

་་

The's amendment ought

to have been accompanied by the imation

of the same

windo

in entration (2)

which

In section 29.

ocean

*8. (1) is

When

Seem

a

the reference

to

"Farm &c"

was the near the end of para

misprint for

form 8 b "; and are amended, it would

para and the Joins thereunder.

desirable to atter all references to

the "Colonial Secretary

the notices to

The Chief Justice

03

to require

be sent to the Garmor by

Co

Paragraph (9) in sec. 29 (which, above, ought not to have been added.

section 42n Sirritar amendment,

That

suggested

15

needs

of the Principal Ordinonex)

in lowes 6+7, srupt the reference to the Colonal Secretary ought to be to "H. M.'s Secretary of State for the

subs (V) might remain unattered;

and

Colonies" whichst subs (vi) ought to provide that the documents

be sent by the Registrer

to the foreign under reference to the Governor for transmission

Cont

that

or Tribunal Through the Secretary of Shanth

to The Law

sec

29

21 wh

in this

*

according

Ordinance

Porn (9) of Officer's report, insuted

an

The suggestion of the 88tation Circular letter of the 8th May lave. That crainter referred also to the

25 Sept. 1902 and 22. Sept. 190g Canters of

ended the adaptations of the prenons "which had

English

vich inter

J5R

Rules

Mind,

guted by

1999

to fact might be win the Reporting

+

used" sk Fuck in "sword".

Englion Rules of fourt for Emething the

Hongkong Courto

Rogatone's

207

to Execute Commission and Letters of Request to

obtain Evidence for forsyn Tribunals Such rubs might Easily have been Embodied of

I

this Ordinance

and

it

is desirable that further legislations should be intropined for this pumport as soon

promptle

The Schedule

Schedule contains many emoro

In Form N. 7,

inserted wrongly at

after the word

a com

the end

has been

line 30

бр

Solicitor for ". On page

7 & lines 7 and 8) the italicired words

L1

before wore thereof

·་

after seirie

"

service thereof.

Should have been

and it

Seeme

very don'tful whether "Note (b)" is appliath

་་

to a

Writ for Service

out of the Jurisdiction.

In view of the fact that there

paragraphs marked "N.B.

Lost B

Seemo

are

sentener

in

unintelligibli.

are

turo

this form,

then

"the final "Note " of the form

hoo

In Form No8 the maxinal notes

N

omitted which should have indicated & the insection of the number of days

of the insertion of

directed by Count

and

where necTTAMŲ,

#

of the

words

·་

of notice

"

In lives 14 2 28 and 30

betree in all

Sharath a to

the several references to forms "N".2 a syra'

'5 ompra', be verified.

and

"N. I

supra respectively connot